Zyverant Free audit

Swansea and South Wales

Your next job is probably one you've already lost.

Zyverant reads your call log, your quotes and your customer history, finds the work slipping past, and puts a figure on it.

Five minutes, your own figures, nothing stored. Prefer a call instead?

Cost
Free
Time
30 minutes, one call
Based on
Your figures, not sector averages
After
No obligation
Profit leak analysis — roofing, 8 staff, 90 days Illustrative
Sales worth investigating — annualised
£47,300
Unfollowed quotes£21,700
Missed enquiries£18,300
Dormant customers£7,300
Largest opportunity — how it's reached
Quote follow-up
Quotes issued in 90 days Observed 61
Of those, never chased after 7 days Observed 24
Would convert with one follow-up Assumed 15%
Worth, annualised Derived £21,700

In words: 24 quotes went unchased. If 15% would have closed with one call, that's 3.6 jobs at an average £1,510 — about £21,700 over a year.

Illustrative figures for a firm of this size. Not a real client, and not a prediction for your business. Full working in the sample audit.

The problem

It isn't a sales problem. It's a follow-up problem.

The work is already coming to you. An enquiry lands at 6:40pm while you're up a ladder. A quote goes out and sits nine days before anyone chases it. A roof you did two years ago is due a check and nobody flags it.

None of that feels like a loss on the day. It only looks like one when somebody adds up a year of it.

What we look at

Five leaks, and how each one is measured

Every audit checks the same five. Pick one to see the signal we look for, how it turns into a number, and what usually fixes it.

Missed enquiries

Signal in your data
Inbound calls with no answer and no return call within 24 hours.
How it's quantified
Unreturned calls × genuine-enquiry rate × your conversion × average job value
Typical fix
Call capture, and a same-day callback rule someone owns.
In the sample audit
34 unreturned in 90 days → £18,300 a year

If a leak can't be evidenced in your own records, we don't claim it. Two of the five above need data you may not be collecting yet — we'll tell you that rather than invent a figure.

Method

From your records to a number you can act on

Whatever you already keep

No new software, no migration, nothing to install. If it's written down somewhere, we can work from it.

  • Call log or phone bill
  • Quotes issued
  • Customer history
  • Job diary
Stage 1 of 4

Sample audit

What the output actually looks like

Expand any line to see the full working. Every figure comes from the one above it, so you can check the arithmetic rather than take our word for it.

Observed counted in your records Assumed an estimate we state and you can challenge Derived calculated from the rows above
Sample audit Roofing contractor · 8 staff · 90-day review Illustrative
01Missed enquiries £18,300/yr
Inbound calls logged (90 days)Observed214
Not answered, no return within 24hObserved34
Estimated genuine enquiries (45%)Assumed15.3
Enquiry to job conversion (22%)Assumed3.4 jobs
Average job valueObserved£1,360
90-day opportunityDerived£4,578
AnnualisedDerived£18,300
What we ruled out
Supplier calls, wrong numbers, and repeat calls from the same number inside an hour. Those come out before the 45% is applied.
Confidence
Higher Call records are unambiguous. The uncertainty sits in the 45%, not the 34.

The 45% and 22% are the two assumptions here. In a real audit both come from your own records, and we show you what we used.

02Unfollowed quotes £21,700/yr
Quotes issued (90 days)Observed61
No recorded follow-up after 7 daysObserved24
Estimated uplift from one follow-up (15%)Assumed3.6 jobs
Average job valueObserved£1,510
90-day opportunityDerived£5,436
AnnualisedDerived£21,700
What we ruled out
Quotes the customer declined in writing, and jobs won without any recorded follow-up. Neither counts toward the 24.
Confidence
Medium The count is solid. The 15% is an estimate until your own quote history replaces it.

The 15% uplift is the assumption doing the work. It is deliberately conservative, and if your own quote data doesn't support it we lower it.

03Dormant customers £7,300/yr
Customers with no job for 18+ monthsObserved210
Estimated reactivation rate (7%)Assumed14.7 jobs
Average service valueObserved£495
Annual opportunityDerived£7,300
What we ruled out
Customers who have moved, one-off emergency callouts, and anyone who asked not to be contacted again.
Confidence
Medium Reactivation rates vary widely by trade. Treat 7% as a placeholder until it is tested.

Lower value per job, but the cheapest of the three to act on, because the customers already know you.

Total worth investigating
£47,300

A gap worth investigating, not a confirmed loss. Nothing counts as lost revenue until it has been checked against the records and challenged.

We'd start with
Quote follow-up

Largest single figure, and the least disruptive of the three to put right.

Illustrative throughout. These are plausible figures for a firm of this size, not results from a client, and not a forecast for your business. Zyverant has no customer results to publish yet.

Your numbers

Put your own figures in

Seven rough numbers, no sign-up. This is an estimate from what you type, not an audit — but it will tell you whether a proper look is worth half an hour.

Calls, emails and form submissions
No answer, and nobody rang back
What is left of a job's price after labour and materials
Sales worth investigating
£40,500
Missed enquiries£18,400
Unchased quotes£22,200
AssumedYou recover a quarter£10,100
DerivedOf which you keep, at your margin£3,000
DerivedAgainst £3,600 a year0.8×

What this calculation assumes
  • The leak figures are sales, not profit. The multiple uses only what you would keep: the quarter recovered, at the gross margin you entered.
  • 45% of unreturned calls were genuine enquiries, not suppliers or wrong numbers.
  • 15% of unchased quotes would close if someone followed up once.
  • 25% of anything identified actually gets recovered — finding a leak and fixing it are different jobs.
  • Missed enquiries convert at the win rate you entered, after the 45% discount above.
  • £3,600 is what that kept profit is measured against — twelve months at the £300 starting rate. It is the cost side of the comparison, not a quote.

Change any of those and the answer changes. That is what the audit is for: it replaces these assumptions with figures from your own records.

Pricing

Start free. Pay only if the maths works.

Start here

Profit leak audit

Free

Thirty minutes on the phone, then a ranked list of what your records suggest you're losing, with the working attached.

  • Call log, quotes and diary reviewed
  • A figure against each leak
  • Assumptions stated so you can challenge them
  • Yours to keep, whatever you decide
Find my biggest leak
If the maths works

Fix the biggest leak

from £300/month

We take the largest leak and build the thing that closes it — a follow-up sequence, a callback rule, service reminders. One at a time, biggest first.

  • One leak addressed properly
  • Founding rate, held while you stay
  • No minimum term
  • Measured against the original figure
Start with an audit
Not built yet

Ongoing monitoring

Not priced

The intention is to keep watching for leaks reopening once they're closed. It doesn't exist yet, and we won't sell it until it does.

  • Planned, not available
  • Founding partners shape what it becomes

Why the prices are on the page. Plenty of firms in this space make you book a call to find out what it costs. You're running a business and you want to know whether this is a £300 decision or a £3,000 one before you give anyone half an hour.

Zyverant is new. No case studies, no testimonials, no customer logos, because there are no customers yet. If the audit comes back small, we'll tell you to keep your money.

Questions

Before you get in touch

What if the audit finds nothing worth fixing?

We say so, and you've spent half an hour rather than money. Signing a bad fit costs us more in the long run than turning one away.

Where do the assumptions come from?

Your records. Conversion rate, average job value and enquiry volumes all come from your own numbers. Where we have to estimate, the estimate is written down and you can argue with it.

Is this an AI product?

We don't lead with software. The audit is analysis. What fixes a leak might be a system, or it might be a change to how quotes get chased.

What do you need from me beforehand?

Nothing prepared. On the call we ask about call volume, quote turnaround and repeat customers. Roughly what you'd tell someone over a pint.

Why is the founding rate lower?

You're taking a risk on something unproven and shaping what gets built first. That's worth more to us right now than the difference in fee.

Am I tied in?

No minimum term. Details are in the terms and the cancellation policy.

Option two — talk it through

Rather go through it on the phone?

The diagnostic runs five checks on figures you type in. On the call we read your actual call log, quotes and diary instead, so the counts are measured rather than estimated. Six fields, then thirty minutes. We reply within one working day.

  1. We email you to fix a time

    Within one working day. Evenings and early mornings are fine — we know when you're on site.

  2. Thirty minutes on the phone

    We go through your call log, your quotes and your diary. Nothing to prepare beforehand.

  3. You get the figures

    Every leak with a number against it, ranked, and the working shown. Yours to keep whatever you decide.